Sunday, April 30, 2017

10 Symptoms of Kidney Disease You Should Know

10 Symptoms of Kidney Disease You Should Know


Chronic renal failure is a disease that has not had symptoms since its early stages , so many people could be suffering this health problem right now without knowing it. There may be many to go for chronic kidney failure (CKD) to kidney disease, and even some people end up suffering from CRI, but without suffering from kidney disease as such.


Like many other diseases, timely detection is key to timely treatment that helps improve quality of life. For this reason, experts recommend getting informed about the topic and learn to know what alert symptoms may be indicating a kidney failure or any other problem related to this organ. ¿ What symptoms indicate that we may be having a kidney problem?


Urination changes
When the kidneys begin to fail the urine presents changes like:

The patient is forced to get up to urinate several times during the night.
Urine may appear frothy or bubbly .
Urine is produced more often, more and a pale color.
It can also produce less urine, less frequent and of a strong color.
You have difficulty urinating or incontinence.

Swelling
When the kidneys do not function properly, the person suffers from fluid retention and as a result swelling in the legs, ankles, feet, face and hands . This symptom can be derived from different diseases and not necessarily from a renal problem; Therefore, it is best to consult the doctor, especially if this symptom is accompanied by another of the aforementioned.

Fatigue
The kidneys play a very important role in our body, so a failure can lead to serious health problems. One of the functions of this important organ, is to produce a hormone called erythropoietin , which is responsible for causing the body to produce red blood cells to transport oxygen to the blood. When the kidney fails the production of erythropoietin decreases and as a result the person can feel tiredness , ailment in their muscles, difficulty in thinking and concentrating, among others.

Skin rash / itching
The kidneys have the function of removing wastes from the blood and all those toxins that our body does not need . When the kidneys begin to fail, they stop doing their work well and begin to accumulate all those wastes in the blood, which will be reflected with rashes and a itch that can be desperate.

Metal flavor in the mouth / breath to ammonia
Kidney failure causes waste and toxins to accumulate in the blood, leading to many health problems. Among this we find that patients may experience bad taste in food and bad breath . He also begins to lose his taste for meat and can even lose a lot of weight because his appetite is suppressed.

Nausea and vomiting
Due to debris that accumulates in the blood and can not be properly removed by the kidney problem, the person also experiences nausea and vomiting, leading to vitamin deficiencies, weight loss and other serious problems.

Short of breath
When there is a difficulty in catching the breath, the kidneys can be related in two ways : the first can be those fluids that can not be eliminated and that can accumulate in the lungs. The second can be derived from a problem of anemia , which is produced by the lack of oxygen-carrying red blood cells and vitamin deficiency.

To feel cold
A kidney problem can lead to another problem such as anemia, which makes the person feel weak, without energy and with a cold that is difficult to control. Often, people with kidney failure express that the cold can feel even if it is hot, and may even experience chills.


Dizziness and difficulty concentrating
Suffering from anemia and a problem of kidney failure, causes the person to begin to have flaws in their memory because they do not transport enough oxygen to the brain. This same fact can make the person unable to concentrate and feel constant dizziness.

Pain in the side / leg
One of the most alarming symptoms of kidney failure is feeling pain in the back or side , either when sitting or when going to the bathroom. This condition is related to polycystic kidney disease and may sometimes indicate a liver problem .

Friday, April 28, 2017

Renal transplantation of live donor is the best opportunity for the patient

Renal transplantation of live donor is the best opportunity for the patient


What are the advantages for congenital kidney patients undergoing live donor kidney transplantation? Living donor kidney transplantation is, in the first place; One of the best opportunities for the patient suffering from renal disease, who is on dialysis or requires transplantation from the point of view of results. This means that living donor kidney transplantation is the one that obtains the longest and best long-term survival of all types of kidney transplantation, in relation to corpse donor transplantation, which would be its direct comparison.
Logically, in the cost-benefit, which is the other system by which we estimate the value of a therapy or a treatment, the kidney transplant of a deceased donor wins because it does not invest anything; Is an organ of a person who has died and therefore, by losing their organs in the same way that they have lost their life, gives them to a person and serves for that person to sustain life and logically cost benefit Which has kidney transplantation of deceased donor is unrivaled in the sense that there does not have to be a healthy person who suffers at the loss of one of their kidneys.

JPEG - 82.4 KB
Rafael Selgas
However, in terms of organ survival, ie how long an average living donor kidney transplant lasts and how long a deceased donor lasts, it does and also earns for several years. It is possible that it can be ensured that while the kidney of a living donor reaches the average 20 years, the cadaver donor is fighting to reach twelve or thirteen, always speaking of averages. The difference is clear.

And from the point of view of the donor and the recipient, what are the differences involved in living donor transplant intervention?

Desde el punto de vista del receptor la intervención es exactamente igual, no hay muchas diferencias, salvo quizá por el hecho de que hay mejores condiciones de programación. El trasplante renal de donante vivo se hace con una preparación previa en todos los sentidos porque se hace el día que se quiere, mientras que el de donante cadáver se hace cuando aparece la oportunidad.

As for the donor, the donor gives the kidney and remains, therefore, with only one of an even organ, and it has been shown in the long run that he lives in the same way as any other person who has not donated that organ and that the donor Intervention generates minimal interference, among which a minimum increase of some incidences could be counted, such as the one that the person has a greater tendency to have high blood pressure in the long term. However, at all times we are talking about increments that are insignificant from the epidemiological and personal point of view.

The delivery that one does to a person who requires it while alive is such a valuable delivery that, from the point of view of the person who gives the organ and who sees how it changes the life to who receives it, that Greater predisposition to hypertension is insignificant, since it is also nothing that is not treatable or irreparable.

What compatibility limitations are there for live donor kidney transplantation?

Compatibility in a living donor transplant is something that currently exists almost by definition only, since there is even a live donor kidney transplant program with blood group incompatibility, which was the limiting factor we had until now.

There is a cross-check that must be made, which, although very few, comes out positive, this is something that can happen and for it has been established what the ONT calls the cross-living donor program, which is a current program in Spain, of exchange of donors all of them alive. It is a well-established donation program in which if I, even though I want to, can not donate to my relative, husband or wife; I can link to a program of multiple care of couples with whom I can get to exchange it.

This, together with the overcoming by treatment of the incompatibility that is established in function of the blood group, have made them doubtless, live donor kidney transplantation is the best option.

What exactly is the intervention in a living donor kidney transplant? Is it a complex intervention?

The operation of the donor is performed by laparoscopy and is intended to be very simple, with minimal discomfort for the patient who usually has an average hospitalization of two or three days which means that their personal, family and work recovery is very good And very fast except for incidents that in surgery can never be said to not exist, it is normal that the patient is fully recovered at most in 10 days.

What is life like for a patient who has only one kidney?

Life with a kidney is completely normal. When we take a kidney for a live transplant we always play for, and so the two kidneys must always be intact, wholeheartedly. Then, when one leaves the individual half of the renal tissue, he does not suffer any loss of his function.

What requirements must a patient have to undergo a kidney transplant?

Renal transplantation may be performed by an individual who has lost his kidney function and is reasonably well able to undergo surgery and undergo immunosuppressive treatment that will always weaken his defenses to a greater or lesser extent. That is the conditioning. It is always understood that when one is transplanted it is taking a positive step in their survival and in their quality of life, although this does not mean that one hundred percent of the transplants that are made succeed.

What level of rejection is being handled at this time in kidney transplantation?

The percentage of success is around 95% We are touching what is called "statistical insignificance" in kidney transplant rejection, but that does not mean that it is an insignificant figure for people, if there are 5 people out of 100 who submit To a kidney transplant and reject it, for these five people this situation is very important.

Wednesday, April 26, 2017

Live donor kidney transplantation. Information for donor and recipient

Live donor kidney transplantation. Information for donor and recipient

The first thing both donor and recipient and their relatives need to know is that living donor transplantation will only be justified and will be accepted after a rigorous risk / benefit study for donor and recipient, as well as an exhaustive Evaluation in accordance with the best ethical standards.
Information is also fundamental in this process. All the agents involved receive previously, and in detail, information of interest to near the type of studies that will prove the viability of the TRDV and the security of the donation.
The worldwide experience accumulated after more than 50 years of TRDV allows to offer a high security for the donation of one of the kidneys.
There is also unanimity of the best survival of grafts and patients in kidney transplantation when the kidney comes from a living donor with respect to a deceased donor. The reasons are multiple, including the fact that it is a programmed surgical procedure in which both the donor and the recipient arrive in an optimal situation for surgery, the optimal quality of the transplanted kidneys and the lower age of the recipients.
Is it risky to donate a kidney?
In general, the risk assumed by a kidney donor is lower than that assumed by other people who undergo general anesthesia and major surgery, since all donors have good health. However, all of them are informed of the risks inherent to anesthesia, surgery and possible intraoperative and postoperative complications, typical of any surgical intervention.
Particular emphasis should also be placed on detailing the circumstances that may arise when living with a single kidney, including exceptional risks, such as severe trauma or infectious or lithiasic medical problems that could compromise the function of the only existing kidney.
In the long term, it can be confirmed that the tendency to progressive loss of glomerular filtration is not significant in any age group; The hypertension does not increase in incidence with the passage of the years and even the vital expectations would be superior with respect to those who maintain the two kidneys since it is a healthy population.
Regarding pregnancy in donor women, there are no additional risks described in gestations in monorrenic patients because they were kidney donors, although special attention will be given to controls of blood pressure, weight gain and proteinuria, generally not different from those Which can be recommended to other types of pregnant women.
Current nephrectomy (removal of the kidney) is done by laparoscopy, with hospital stays being increasingly reduced. Donors should live a sedentary life for the first two weeks and after that period, and according to the type of work, the return to normal and personal work.
Sports activities can be performed by donors without any special care or limitation within 6-8 weeks of surgery. In any case, from the analysis of the large donor series it can be inferred that if strict selection criteria are maintained, long-term donor security can be considered guaranteed.
The quality of life studies of kidney donors appreciate improvements in the affective sphere and improvements in the perception of quality of life since the motivations for donation are continuously reinforced in all cases in which the transplantation continues to fulfill its function . In the case of spouses, in addition to an excellent graft survival, the additional advantages for the donor focus on the possibility of a more normal couple life, without the travel limitations imposed by the dialysis or the comorbidity associated with problems with Vascular access or others related to renal failure.
Finally, we present a table summarizing the main risks for the recipient of the living donor.

Study and selection of live kidney donor
The integral study of a live kidney donation aims at verifying the following requirements:
That the donation is free, conscious and disinterested. It implies, among other requirements, that the donor: a) does not suffer from cognitive or emotional disorders; B) it has an intellectual capacity and a level of communication that allows it to understand the information on risks and benefits; C) is not subject to external pressures, and d) does not seek material rewards of any kind.
That the donor has normal kidneys and the risk of developing long-term nephropathy is reduced: a) currently has normal renal function and is free of any significant analytical or structural renal impairment; B) absence of hereditary family nephropathy that may develop later, and c) there are no processes or alterations that increase the risk of nephropathy, for example, systemic diseases, severe hypertension (HTA) or diabetes.
That the donor does not present other diseases or alterations that may: a) increase surgical or anesthetic risk ) be impaired by a minor renal reserve, or c) be transmitted to the recipient, such as cancer or infections.
That the recipient is acceptable for transplantation: no contraindications, and its vital and rehabilitative prognosis is reasonably good and will improve significantly with TRDV.
 That transplantation is technically possible with an acceptable risk: a) vessels and urinary tract are appropriate (donor and recipient), and b) there is no immunological incompatibility

Age: The minimum age for donation in our country is 18 years, for legal reasons. There is no well-established maximum age limit (although in Spain rarely the donation is considered more than 70 years).
Habits : Smoking and alcohol abuse (> 60g / day) may warrant further exploration and increase the risk of postoperative complications in general. The complete cessation of these habits is strongly recommended at least 4 weeks before the intervention. Definitive abandonment should be emphasized, since smoking increases the donor's long-term mortality risk. Addiction to drug abuse is a contraindication to donation.
Hypertension : Blood pressure at separate visits should be <140 / 90mmHg; The mean values ​​of ABPM should be <135/85 mmHg during the day and <120/75 mmHg during sleep. The donation of a mild or moderate hypertensive without other cardiovascular risk factors and good renal function is admissible, provided certain conditions are met: a) age greater than 50 years; B) non-African American; C) absence of visceral repercussions of hypertension (ECG-echocardiography, fundus, microalbuminuria <30 mg / day); D) tension can be controlled by changes in lifestyle and use of no more than one hypotensive, and e) there is a reasonable assurance that the donor will continue to have control and treatment indefinitely. As in the general population, Hypertension is associated with higher donor mortality in the medium term. On the other hand, and although there are conflicting data, a recent meta-analysis seems to confirm that the donation is associated with an increase in blood pressure of 5 mmHg. In addition, with adequate selection and management of their hypertension, hypertensive donors do not appear to have poorer kidney function after donation, at least in the short term. All this would justify the use of mild hypertensive donors with life expectancy limited by their current age, if adequate control is to be expected. Hypertensive donors do not appear to have poor renal function after donation, at least in the short term. All this would justify the use of mild hypertensive donors with life expectancy limited by their current age, if adequate control is to be expected. Hypertensive donors do not appear to have poor renal function after donation, at least in the short term. All this would justify the use of mild hypertensive donors with life expectancy limited by their current age, if adequate control is to be expected.
Obesity: Severe obesity (BMI> 35) is a contraindication for donation, as it is associated with an increased surgical risk and long-term development of CKD. Obesity between 30 and 35 BMI (or waist diameter> 82 cm in women or> 102 cm in men) may also be a contraindication if it is associated with other risk factors such as hypertension, altered basal glycemia or family history, microalbuminuria. In any case, it should be noted that it is possible to have a greater risk in the long term and orientate itself to the donor in order to achieve maximum weight reduction before the intervention and to maintain it indefinitely through changes in eating habits.
Renal function: In patients below the age of 40 years a clearance> 90 ml / min / 1.73 m2, especially in obese subjects, is desirable, while many centers admit minor clearings (around 70 ml / min and even less) in donors Of older (> 60 years).
Proteinuria:  A proteinuria> 300 mg / day rule donation . The value of microalbuminuria is not well established with respect to donation: a microalbuminuria> 30 mg / day is a relative contraindication. In the case of proteinuria (150-300 mg / day) or in the presence of microalbuminuria (30-300 mg / day), the donation tends to be discouraged, but the case may be assessed individually, taking into account other factors such as age, Obesity, hypertension or altered glucose metabolism.
Cardiovascular assessment: It aims to rule out significant heart diseases that are contraindicated by increased donor risk: ischemic heart disease, heart failure, valvulopathy, significant left ventricular hypertrophy or significant arrhythmia. Adequately selected donors do not seem to see their cardiovascular risk posttransplant increased.
Diabetes and metabolic syndrome:  Minimum study: basal glycemia, HbA1c and lipid profile . Indication of functional tests, basically oral glucose tolerance test (TTOG ):
A) first-degree family history of type 2 diabetes;
B) altered basal glycemia (100-125 mg / dl) or HbA1c> 6-6.5%;
C) obesity, and
D) other data that complete or create risk of metabolic syndrome : hypertension, dyslipidemia (triglycerides> 150mg / dl or HDL cholesterol <35 in men / <39 in women), microalbuminuria.
 Regarding the donation :
The antecedent or diagnosis of diabetes (baseline glycemia> 126 on two occasions or random blood glucose or at 2 hours on TTOG> 200) is an absolute contraindication for donation.
The history of gestational diabetes is an absolute contraindication, given the high rate of late development of diabetes.
The altered basal glycemia and the hydrocarbon intolerance (blood glucose at 2 hours between 140 and 199) are a relative contraindication and should be evaluated individually, taking into account the response to a simple intervention plan (diet, exercise, statins). The altered basal glycemia in the high range (110-125), the family history, the presence of other risk factors or metabolic syndrome predict a greater tendency for the later development of diabetes and renal involvement and would incline to discard the donation.
Respiratory: Respiratory function tests would be indicated in a clinic indicative of chronic lung disease and in large smokers.
Cancer screening : Studies are done of:
Colon: indicated according to recommendations for the general population: family history in the first degree, age> 50 years and others. Minimum: fecal occult blood . Recommended colonoscopy.
Breast: mammography / ultrasound for women> 40 years, or earlier if there is a family history.
Uterus: cervical cytology and genital ultrasound.
Prostate: rectal examination and prostate specific antigen for men> 50 years, or earlier if there is a family history of early prostate cancer.
Specific studies based on preliminary study findings or personal or family history; For example: dermatology examination if there is a family history of melanoma or a very high number of nevus.
The donation is ruled out if there is previous diagnosis of hematological, gastrointestinal, testicular, melanoma, lung, breast, renal or urinary cancer, choriocarcinoma or monoclonal gammopathy.
In selected cases in which the cancer is considered cured and without risk of transmission, the donation can be considered after discussion with the partner.
Indications and Contraindications of Kidney Transplantation
The main indication of living donor transplant is the early transplantation ( preemptive ). This will allow the patient to get rid of the complications of dialysis and, moreover, it has been shown to have better results than the transplantation performed when dialysis has already begun.
Prior indications of live kidney transplantation are univiteline twins and identical HLA siblings. In addition, we will have very favorable conditions when the donor is young and male.

Hyperimmunized patients
These patients can benefit from a live donation from identical HLA siblings or from those who share a haplotype or parents. If, with all the family members, the cross-test continues to be positive, then it is ideal to enter into hyperimmune renal transplant programs by sharing deceased donors or cross-living renal transplant programs. Before these desensitization therapies can be tested in these patients to check if the cross-test is negative with the living donors.
Patients candidates for pancreas-kidney transplantation
The best therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal failure is a simultaneous, ideally anticipated transplantation of the pancreas and kidney with organs from the same deceased donor. Unfortunately the shortage of pancreatic donors is very pronounced, since the selection criteria include very young donor ages and with hardly acute comorbidity. This causes patients to spend long periods on dialysis waiting for the simultaneous transplant.
An alternative to simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation for type 1 diabetics with renal failure is sequential kidney transplantation from a living donor followed by a pancreas transplant from a deceased donor. This therapeutic strategy would have the advantage of being able to do live transplantation in advance, avoiding the morbidity of the dialysis
Diseases with high relapse rate in renal transplantation
Patients with kidney disease with a high rate of relapse after transplantation have an absolute contraindication for live renal donation. They may be relative in a first transplant, but if it results in recurrence of primary renal disease and this is the cause of graft loss, the contraindication is absolute for a second transplant.
Donor alive woman or donor with low weight
In kidney transplantation donor age and graft size are known factors that condition the long-term graft evolution. Women tend to have smaller kidneys, with 17% fewer nephrons than men. The number of nephrons per kidney has a positive correlation with the weight of the kidney and negative with the age of the individual. It has been described that the female sex of the donor due to the smaller size of the kidneys negatively influences the evolution of the grafts when they are transplanted to men.
Overall, the current evidence tells us that when the donor is female and the age is advanced and the recipient is male and young, we are not in the most appropriate circumstances to ensure good results in the medium and long term. Thus, this donor-receptor match would represent a relative contraindication for live renal donation. And as such a relative contraindication, if it is finally considered opportune to perform live transplantation with this type of donor, it should be after extensive information on the risks to donor and recipient.
In general, these more unfavorable conditions may be less important if an early transplant is being proposed, since the advantages of not going through dialysis are likely to compensate, at least in part, for the drawbacks of these types of donor pairs -receiver.
Monitoring the donor alive in the short, medium and long term
The causes of long-term mortality in renal donors are similar to those observed in the general population, with cardiovascular complications, neoplasias and traffic accidents being the most frequent.
The incidence of mortality is, in fact, lower than expected in relation to the general population, adjusted for age and sex.
Unilateral nephrectomy performed on a healthy person, therefore with excellent renal function and without added risk factors (hypertension, obesity, diabetes, etc.), does not carry a risk of long-term nephropathy. Successive revisions of very large series and with a long follow-up interval show this.
Elderly age at the time of donation may influence the deterioration of renal function in the long term, but similarly to what is observed in the general population as the age advances.
Arterial hypertension
The incidence of hypertension in long-term controlled donor series is similar to that observed in the general population and is more frequently detected, as expected, in older donors.
It is advisable for donors to perform periodic blood pressure checks, as early detection of blood pressure allows adequate treatment and prevents the development of more serious complications.
Postodonation gestational hypertension
Recently two publications have appeared that study the possible relation of the renal donation in the appearance of gestational problems. Reisaeter et al. Review the experience with Norwegian donors and conclude that the incidence of preeclampsia is more frequent in donors after donation than before and also more frequent
Than in a control group of non-donor women. On the other hand, Ibrahim et al. Published the experience of the Mayo Clinic and concluded that their donors also have a higher incidence of preeclampsia, gestational hypertension and gestational diabetes after donation than before. In both cases, these are retrospective studies that open a question and invite a more detailed analysis of this question, in case it is necessary to take this into account when informing potential donors.
Proteinuria
Reduction of renal mass as a result of nephrectomy minimally increases protein excretion in urine. But the incidence of long-term proteinuria in renal donors is highly variable according to published series.
Again, it is important to emphasize the importance of early detection of proteinuria, since treatment with angiotensin synthesis inhibitors (ACE inhibitors) or angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARBs), administered early, may be especially useful.
Renal insufficiency
Renal function of the remaining kidney satisfactorily suppresses renal mass decrease. Normally serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate reach 70-80% of the value prior to nephrectomy and remain stable over the years. In elderly donors or with filtration in the low limit of normality it is possible to observe values ​​of
Discretely affected serum creatinine. Short term recovery of renal function is worse as age increases at the time of donation, body mass index and especially the lower the glomerular filtration rate before donation. Black donors also have a lower recovery of baseline glomerular filtration rate.
It is currently recommended that prospective and systematic long-term donor follow-up and early treatment of individuals developing high blood pressure be recommended.
Other issues to consider
Currently one of the main and most worrying reasons for kidney graft loss is the rejection caused by the abandonment or irregular taking of immunosuppressive medication. This medication should be taken strictly to avoid these events, which can end with the loss of the graft.
Patients who receive a kidney from a donation in asitolia usually require longer hospital stay, given the characteristics of this type of transplant.

Tuesday, April 25, 2017

Transplants - Of Interest - Kidney Transplantation

Transplants - Of Interest - Kidney Transplantation


The kidney donor may be a living person related or related to the patient or a deceased person. Usually, the kidneys of the recipient are not removed and the new organ is placed in the abdominal area.

How long does the operation last?

The operation lasts about three hours and, if there is an option, the diabetic people are given at the same time a pancreas transplant that lasts another three hours.

How old will the new organ last?

 Currently kidney transplantation has great results: patient survival is over 95% after surgery, and the kidney functions correctly in 90% of cases at the end of the first year .

The half-life of a cadaver donor kidney is about 10-12 years , and 15 years or more when the kidney is from an unrelated living donor. If the kidneys come from identical twin siblings survivors of more than 20 years are recorded.

What will my life be like after the transplant?

You can lead a fairly normal life, but you should follow a healthy and balanced diet to not gain weight.

Monday, April 24, 2017

How long does a transplanted kidney last?


Her face struck me as first-impressed when she entered the office, and she noticed. But I did not identify her until she told me not to recognize her, even though 10 years ago she had had a kidney transplant. In fact, it was almost the same time that I did not see it, mainly because in our country, the vast majority of renal transplant patients are followed up with their general practitioners, who are nephrologists. Another reason she had not seen her again is because of the success of her transplant. That is, there was no surgical reason for me to consult.

Although this time her gynecologist had referred to me for a groin trouble, her real concern was that someone had told her that transplanted kidneys only lasted for 10 years.

I had to explain to him that this information is misapplied statistical data, since when these studies are done based on the clinical records, the figures that are published are "averages". That is, when we count the functional evolution of the transplanted kidneys, we will have a number of cases of kidneys that have lost their kidney function for different causes and multiple factors, some of them in relative short time, which goes From one to five years, but others maintain their functioning for many years.

In our country we have a record of patients with functional renal transplantation for 25 years. As well as others with 23, 21, 20, 19, 17, 14 ..., years, in good health.

The reasons for the durability of a transplant are so varied, ranging from "chronic rejection" for immunological reasons, transplant nephropathy because of some medications, as well as interstitial nephritis because of other medications. Another effect is due to the recurrence of the original disease in the transplanted kidney, as well as to the continuous effect of the medical conditions that the patient carries before transplantation, such as hypertension, diabetes and hyperuricemia (uric acid) .

But there are also external factors that have to do with loss of function in transplants, such as: the age and functional status of the transplanted organ. Because a kidney donated by a 60-year-old does not rejuvenate a 20-year-old patient.

To this is added the quality of preservation of the transplanted organ, since the statistical average is better in the transplanted kidneys of living donors than in the case of deceased donors.

In the first, the transplant is done a few minutes after being extracted from the donor. While in organs of deceased donors, although

'Preservation in situ', usually take from 12 to 36 hours for transplantation. The fact of better compatibility also plays a long-term role in transplant durability.

In conclusion: The durability of a kidney transplant is unpredictable, and the only thing we can do is take care of it as much as possible, usually taking the indicated medications, and doing their routine check-ups in the indicated time, besides leading a life and food as healthy possible.

Sunday, April 23, 2017

7. MEDICATION TO BE TAKEN BY THE TRANSPLANTED PATIENT

7. MEDICATION TO BE TAKEN BY THE TRANSPLANTED PATIENT


From the transplant you must take medications called IMMUNOSUPRESORES. The taking of medication is obligatory to diminish the reaction of the organism in front of the organ transplanted, is what is known as rejection. Immunosuppressants are taken from the first day of transplantation and should continue to be taken throughout life. They are IMPRESCINDIBLE for the patient and under no circumstances MUST LEAVE TO TAKE OR MODIFY THE DOSES BY OWN ACCOUNT. Failure to take them can mean transplant failure.

Taking this medication decreases the body's defenses and causes an increased risk of infections, which can sometimes be very serious. NEVER FORGET THESE TWO RISKS: INFECTION AND REJECTION

The doctor is the one who indicates the doses of the medicines and when it is necessary to modify the dose. In order to ensure that the doses taken by the patient are correct, blood tests are performed periodically. Thus we determine the concentration of the drugs in blood and we know if the dose is correct, or it is necessary to modify it. The trend is as time goes by, decreasing the dose of these medications.

7.1 TREATMENT KEYS WELL DONE

It is vital that the patient perform the treatment correctly, for which we advise:

1. Try to learn the name of the medicines and their purpose.
2. Memorize, if possible, the doses, hours and days in which you must take them.
3. Do not rely on your memory and check the doses, hours and days to take them
4. Take the medication as it has been prescribed, do not make modifications on your own.
5. Keep medication stored, tidy, clean and dry, away from points of light, heat or moisture.
6. Dispose of depleted or expired bottles or boxes.
7. Never change medicine boxes, or put them in another box, is a source of mistakes.
8. Record the unintended effects of the medication and report it to your doctor: vomiting, hives, headache, stomach pain or any other.
9. If you make a mistake in one dose, do not try to correct it in the next one. Write it down for comment.
10. In case of forgetfulness, if more than 4 hours have elapsed take the next dose, but, take the one that corresponds.
11. Do not take any other medications without first telling them.
12. Immunosuppressive treatment YOU MUST ALWAYS TAKE IT.
13. In the case of vomiting and believing that you have vomited part of the medication, you should take at least half the dose. If you have vomited everything, you must take it again.
14. When medical tests are to be performed, you should try to adjust the time taken to take the medication.
7.2 IMMUNOSUPPRESSORS EMPLOYED AT THE CURRENT MOMENT

The most commonly used immunosuppressants at the present time are:

 CYCLOSPORINE

Ciclosporin is the active ingredient. The commercial name by which the patient will know it is SANDIMUN NEORAL ®. Its use in organ transplantation begins in the year 1980. It is the first of the immunosuppressants so we have more information. The effects of this medication are frequent and are usually avoided by modifying the doses of this medicine, although in some cases it is necessary to replace it with another.

Taking SANDIMUN NEORAL causes a number of side effects, including the occurrence of hypertension in patients who were not hypertensive, deterioration of kidney function, excessive hair growth, headache, redness of The face, the appearance of a tremor in hands and fingers, nasal congestion, enlargement of the gums, diarrhea and the possibility of appearance of nodules in the breasts.

If the patient has some of the side effects described, you should ALWAYS consult your doctor, but you should NEVER discontinue or modify the dose on your own.

The presentation of SANDIMUN NEORAL is in tablets of 100, 50 and 25 milligrams. Its use allows reducing the dose of corticosteroids and in some cases their suppression. The patient will take it twice a day, every 12 hours.

TACROLIMUS or FK-506

The onset of this medication is after Cystosporine (SANDIMUN NEORAL®). In the pharmacy the patient will find it with the name PROGRAF ®.

As with SANDIMUN NEORAL®, PROGRAF also has a number of side effects such as hand and finger tremor, headache, diarrhea and nausea, and causes elevations of blood glucose levels that can force the patient into Weeks after transplant to need to inject insulin.

The presentation of this drug is in tablets of 0.5, 1 and 5 milligrams. Its administration is also orally, twice a day. It is very important that you take it on an empty stomach and with some liquid, preferably water (never take with grapefruit juice). You should not eat food one hour before or one hour after taking PROGRAF, as this may interfere with the absorption of the medicine. The patient should always take this medication for a few hours or so fixed and take into account the diet of not ingesting food.

It is very important that if the patient is going to take any new medication, check with your doctor beforehand, as any medication may interfere with PROGRAF.

MICOFENOLATO

These immunosuppressants have the advantage over the aforementioned ones, which do not affect the function of the kidney. The trade name is CELL-CELPT ® and MYFORTIC ®. Usually they are used in association with SANDIMUN NEORAL or PROGRAF. They can also cause side effects, which in these cases will be primarily of gastrointestinal origin such as diarrhea, nausea, abdominal discomfort and vomiting.

At the beginning of treatment with these medicines, the doctor will perform tests to know the status of white blood cells and platelets.
Its administration is also orally. They are usually taken 2 or 3 times a day.

Azathioprine

Commercially known as IMUREL ®. As a side effect can cause vomiting and hair loss. As its action is at the level of the marrow preventing the normal manufacture of lymphocytes, and causing leukocyte decline, it is necessary to perform control analytics.

It is usually taken once or twice a day, usually at bedtime. At present it is hardly used. It comes in 50 mg tablets, is given orally.

PREDNISONE

This drug belongs to the family of CORTICOIDS , it can have a great variety of side effects. It highlights its potent immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory effects. The usual thing is that after transplantation is started with high doses of this drug and gradually reduce the dose gradually, until reaching a dose minina and complete suppression thereof.

Among the most striking side effects highlights the full moon face (rounded), increased appetite and body hair, the appearance of facial acne. It is quite frequent that occasions mood swings. One of the most important alterations is the increase of blood glucose, which forces the patient to perform a diet, moderate physical exercise and medication if necessary. As with other medicines, side effects will go away as the dose decreases.

Some patients cause increased sweating, joint pain, dry skin, salt retention, blurred vision. These alterations are usually as frequent as the full moon face, they may appear in the course of time.
In general, all these side effects tend to disappear once the administration of Prednisone is suspended.

It is very important that the patient NEVER CHANGE THE DOSE OR STOP TAKING THE MEDICATION. If, for any reason, the patient erroneously decides to abandon the medication and stop taking Prednisone suddenly, it disappears from the blood and since the adrenal glands have not been working for some time, they are slow to start again, leading to a dangerous situation. Lack of corticosteroids in the body.

The doctor is in charge of reducing progressively, weekly, in order that gradually the adrenal glands begin to function.

Although there are many side effects described by the drugs that must be taken to avoid rejection, not all of them occur and in most cases they are usually reversible, disappearing as we decrease the dose.

Saturday, April 22, 2017

Causes and consequences of proteinuria after renal transplantation


INTRODUCTION

The presence of proteinuria is a frequent finding after renal transplantation, and affects 30-45% of patients per year 1 . Traditionally, the literature on proteinuria after transplantation discussed the differential diagnosis of high-level proteinuria and its relation to patient graft survival 2 . In the last five years we have learned that proteinuria, at all levels, is an important biological marker that identifies grafts and patients with poor prognosis. These studies suggest two questions that we will try to answer in this review: What are the causes of low and high level proteinuria after transplantation? And why is the relationship between proteinuria and the reduction in survival of both the graft and the patient?

PREVALENCE

The prevalence of proteinuria varies between 15 and 45% in different studies, and this variation is mainly due to differences in the level of proteinuria used to define the value considered as abnormal 1 and at the time proteinuria has been determined . We believe that it is important to diagnose proteinuria during the first months after transplantation, which allows us to identify grafts and patients at high risk. For this purpose, we showed in Figure 1 the prevalence of proteinuria at one year of transplantation in live donor and corpse kidney recipients. As can be observed, there are no significant differences in the prevalence or level of proteinuria between these two groups.

Data on the prevalence of albuminuria after transplantation are scarcer. In studies conducted at our service, we demonstrated that albuminuria is common and affects most patients with proteinuria, even of low level. For example, more than 80% of patients with proteinuria between 150 and 500 mg / day and 100% of patients with higher levels of proteinuria have albuminuria 3 . Among patients without proteinuria, approximately 15% have albuminuria above 30 mg / day 3 .

CAUSES OF PROTEINURIA

Proteinuria in renal transplantation may be due to multiple causes (Table 1). Patients with high proteinuria (> 1,500 mg / day) frequently have glomerulopathy in the graft (in 80% of cases) 3 . However, in patients with lower levels, establishing the cause of proteinuria can be difficult. We will briefly consider the different causes of proteinuria.

Residual Proteinuria

The presence of proteinuria from the native kidneys may complicate the interpretation of proteinuria detected after transplantation. This is common in patients who receive an early renal transplant or shortly after initiating dialysis and, therefore, with a significant renal function and residual diuresis 4 . Results of two studies provide us with practical guidelines to aid in the interpretation of proteinuria in these patients. First, these studies demonstrate that pretransplantation proteinuria, even when it is of nephrotic range, decreases abruptly during the first weeks after receiving a normal transplant renal transplant 4,5 . This decrease is probably due to the decrease in blood flow that occurs in the native kidneys after a transplant, if the graft has a good function 5 . This latter point is important because, in our experience, in recipients with poor initial graft function the blood flow in the native kidneys is maintained and 'native' proteinuria persists. A second study helps us in the interpretation of proteinuria 4 . First, in patients with normal-graft graft, the presence of proteinuria greater than 3,000 mg / day at three weeks after transplantation should not be attributed to the native kidneys but indicates the presence of glomerular disease in the graft (probably a recurrence of one Glomerulopathy). Second, proteinuria greater than 1.  500 mg / day per year of the transplant and / or an increase in proteinuria from the third week to the year post-transplant in more than 500 mg / day indicate a pathology in the graft. Third, the native kidneys may have low levels of proteinuria (less than 500 mg / day) even one year after transplantation, although proteinuria is expected to decrease with time.

Glomerular graft diseases

In a previous study we assessed protocol biopsies in patients with proteinuria year after transplantation 3 . Only 9% of these patients had glomerulopathy. However, among patients with proteinuria levels of more than 1,500 mg / day, 80% had evidence of glomerular disease. Other studies support these results 2 . We must consider three types of glomerulopathy in the graft: recurrent disease, de novo disease and transplant glomerulopathy.

Table 2 summarizes the prevalence and consequences for graft recurrence of the most common glomerulopathies. It emphasizes that in most studies, the diagnosis of recurrence has been based on the presence of proteinuria. Segmental and focal glomerulosclerosis (GSF) is a disease with a high recurrence risk, affecting approximately 30% of patients. Previous studies have identified subgroups of patients with GSF that have a much higher risk and include: patients diagnosed before age 18, patients with rapid progression (less than three years) of disease 6  and, in particular, patients with History of recurrences in previous transplants. Approximately 50% of patients with GSF recurrence lose the graft. Membranous nephropathy (NM) is also associated with a high risk of recurrence. Protocol biopsy studies demonstrated that histologic recurrence of NM occurs generally during the first months after transplantation in 40% of cases and that, initially, histologic changes do not cause proteinuria 7 . IgA nephropathy frequently occurs (> 50%) after transplantation, although histological changes are usually mild and consist of the presence of IgA deposits detected by immunofluorescence and small mesangial deposits detected by electron microscopy, but without proliferation of mesangial cells or clinical manifestations. It is rare that recurrent IgA nephropathy causes loss of graft, Although we have observed rare cases with an aggressive clinical behavior accompanied by a high level of proteinuria. Mesangiocapillar (or membranoproliferative, GNMP) glomerulopathy has acquired great interest lately due to new data that allow us to distinguish several subtypes of this disease 8,9 . From the point of view of recurrence, distinguishing between these types of GNMP has important clinical consequences. For example, in cases of GNMP associated with monoclonal proteins, the recurrence of the disease can occur rapidly and has an aggressive clinical presentation 10 . Patients with type I MPAG associated with hypocomplementemia also have a high risk of recurrence 10,11 . In general,

Protocol biopsy studies revealed that, in many cases, the recurrence of glomerulopathy is not associated with proteinuria 7,10 . This is of interest for a number of reasons: Firstly, the histological diagnosis by protocol biopsies gives us for the first time information on when the recurrence occurs and also, for the first time, gives us information about the histological changes that occur during the phases Initials of these diseases. Secondly, it is reasonable to think that the treatment of these recurrences in their initial stages will be more effective than in more advanced stages. Third, we must remember that low-level proteinuria may be the first manifestation of a recurrence of native glomerulopathy, Which may have negative implications for long-term grafting. Therefore, it is important to investigate patients with low-level proteinuria and follow them closely, through periodic determinations and performing a biopsy if a progressive increase in proteinuria is demonstrated.

In some cases, the graft develops glomerulopathy that is not recurrent but has the histological features of native kidney glomerulopathy. These glomerulopathies are generally diagnosed later than recurrent and may result in graft loss 13 . The most common histological types include GSF 14 , NM and mesangiocapillar. They are infrequent diseases of poorly defined etiology.

Transplant glomerulopathy (GT) has been recognized for many years as a disease that is generally diagnosed several years after transplantation and can cause high-level proteinuria, even of nephrotic range 15,16 . In recent years we have learned that this disease, in most cases, is due to damage of the capillaries produced by anti-HLA class II antibodies 17 . The use of protocol biopsies and the ability to effectively measure these antibodies have allowed us to recognize that, in many patients, WG is developed during the first months after transplantation and that its clinical presentation frequently consists of progressive loss of function Graft with severe hypertension and low level proteinuria.

In more recent studies (presented at the American Transplant Congress, ATC, 2011), we have shown that proteinuria is an early marker of damage to the glomerular capillaries by anti-HLA II antibodies, before the histological manifestations of GT were visible . The presence of proteinuria among all patients with anti-HLA II antibodies identifies a subgroup of patients with a high incidence of glomerulitis and a high risk of developing GT in the future. Studies performed with an electron microscope showed that damage to the endothelial cells of the glomerular capillary precedes the histological changes that we consider to be WG diagnoses 18 .

Proteinuria associated with tubular and interstitial damage

Published studies many years ago proteinuria attributed to "chronic transplant rejection ' 15 . In most of these cases, the biopsy showed GT changes. Biopsy studies in patients with proteinuria 3 demonstrated that there is a subgroup of patients with chronic transplant nephropathy (interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy 19 ), without glomerular disease, but with low levels of proteinuria. Frequently, these patients have albuminuria 3 and, therefore , they may have occult glomerular disease. At the same time, the proximal tubule reabsorbs large amounts of albumin 20 , making it possible that the proteinuria in these patients is due to tubular damage.

Proteinuria secondary to the use of m-TOR inhibitor


The use of sirolimus or everolimus has been associated with the development of proteinuria in renal transplantation in numerous studies 1,21,22 . Initially, this observation occurred in patients with chronic graft nephropathy after switching from calcineurin inhibitors (ICN) to sirolimus with the intention of preserving renal function. For this reason it was suggested that proteinuria associated with sirolimus was the result of the hemodynamic effect secondary to CNI. At this time, the evidence indicates that m-TOR inhibitors have direct effects on protein filtration in the glomerulus and specifically on the podocyte. Letavernier, et al. 23 demonstrated that sirolimus affects the synthesis of VEGF, which is essential for podocyte and endothelial cell survival, As well as for intracellular Akt signaling, which is critical for differentiation, adhesion and survival of epithelial cells. More recent studies have shown a decrease in the expression of constituent proteins of the diaphragmatic cleft, an essential structure for the selective ultrafiltration of the glomerulus 24,25 .

Clinical studies indicate that the presence of proteinuria in a patient treated with sirolimus may have negative consequences for the graft. In studies of conversion of ICN to sirolimus it was found that specifically in patients with proteinuria, conversion to sirolimus had negative effects on graft survival 26 . In isolated cases 27 the development of GSF has been detected in grafts treated with sirolimus. In particular, in patients with incipient glomerulopathies (mainly recurrent IgA), m-TOR inhibitor drugs may produce a significant increase in proteinuria and impairment of renal function. Conversely, There is no clear evidence that sirolimus impairs grafting in patients who maintain a low and stable level of proteinuria (<500 mg / day). However, these patients should be followed closely, measuring proteinuria periodically and, if this increase progressively, the suspension of the m-TOR inhibitor should be considered.

Proteinuria related to donor and recipient factors


Interestingly, among all patients with proteinuria at one year of transplantation, 51% have a clear cause; Include glomerulopathy on biopsy, sirolimus or anti-HLA class II antibodies. However, 49% of patients with proteinuria do not present any of these factors. This observation led us to explore other factors that may be related to proteinuria (table 3) (abstract presented in ATC, 2011) 1 .

It is interesting to consider the relationship between proteinuria and donor and recipient demographic factors 3 . Proteinuria is more common and more abundant in transplants from smaller or lesser-functioning donors (major donors, female donors, relatively lower donors), and in larger recipient transplants (male recipients with a higher body mass index [ BMI]). These data suggest that the difference in size / function between the donor and the recipient determines, in part, the risk of proteinuria. Physiologically, it is possible that this difference in size causes glomerular hyperfiltration, which may lead to proteinuria and progressive deterioration of renal function 28,29 . A possible example of this model is shown in figure 2, In which it is emphasized that the percentage of patients with proteinuria increases with the age of the donor. At the same time, in each donor group defined by age, the risk of proteinuria increases progressively the higher the weight of the recipient.

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROTEINURIA AND INJERENCE SURVIVAL

Interest in proteinuria after transplantation is basically due to its relationship with graft survival. In general, when the level of proteinuria increases, graft survival decreases (figure 3). In this figure, the risk of graft loss progressively increases with the level of proteinuria, and this risk is noticeable even in patients who are considered to have a low proteinuria level (<500 mg / day). In previous studies 3, we calculated that, compared to grafts without proteinuria, the risk of graft loss with proteinuria levels between 150 and 500 mg / day increased to 2.45 times, to 6.07 times in patients with proteinuria between 501 and 1,500 mg / day and to 14.3 times with proteinuria levels above 1,500 mg / day.

What is the relationship between the level of proteinuria and the survival of the graft? Our proposal is that proteinuria is an indicator of a series of aggressions that can affect the graft and that these are mainly, and not proteinuria, that cause the loss of the transplant. For example, it is very likely that glomerulopathy is the leading cause of graft loss in patients with high levels of proteinuria due to glomerular disease. It is also possible that in these patients the presence of high levels of proteinuria can produce interstitial damage to the graft 30 . It is much less clear why grafts with low levels of proteinuria also have a compromised survival 31,32 and it is in this case that, again, We have to consider the cause of proteinuria (Table 1 and Table 3). Low levels of proteinuria may indicate: 1) the first stages of recurrence of glomerulopathy; 2) the effect of anti-HLA class II antibodies, or 3) the existence of a significant disproportion between graft function and recipient needs. In each of these cases proteinuria is related to a reduction in graft survival, but the mechanism of graft damage is different. There are two forms of low-level proteinuria, which are probably not associated with an unfavorable prognosis: residual proteinuria and proteinuria induced by m-TOR inhibitors. Even in these cases, We have to take precautions and follow the patient closely to confirm that it does not increase during follow-up. If this occurs, we can rule out the possibility that proteinuria is residual 4 and we must look for other causes.

To understand the relationship between proteinuria and graft survival we must also consider that the presence of proteinuria is associated with other characteristics of the donor, recipient and graft 3 . For example, proteinuria is associated with decreased renal function, and although it is important to consider this relationship, statistically the relationship between proteinuria and graft survival is independent of graft function 3 .

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROTEINURIA AND PATIENT SURVIVAL

Proteinuria in renal transplantation is associated with a reduction in patient survival. Several studies already published have shown this relationship 33-35 . Specifically, other studies showed that patients with proteinuria have a risk of increased cardiovascular 2.45 times as compared to patients without proteinuria 36 . In more recent studies in our group (abstract presented in ATC, 2011) we confirmed the relationship between a progressive increase in proteinuria and a decrease in patient survival and we began a study of the factors that may explain or contribute to this relationship Figure 4). This figure highlights that even low levels of proteinuria, less than 500 mg / day,

We must consider three types of factors to try to explain the relationship between proteinuria and patient survival: first, it is possible that the factors that cause proteinuria also increase the risk of the patient. An examination of these factors (Table 3) does not suggest that this is a plausible explanation and, in fact, in preliminary studies a relationship between factors related to proteinuria and patient survival has not been found. Second, it is possible that patients with proteinuria may acquire or have other factors that may be related to patient survival 3 . We have recently expanded these studies (ATC, 2011) and, indeed, Proteinuria is related to other biochemical parameters (elevated lipids and decreased albumin and hemoglobin), blood pressure and decreased graft function. All these variables are related to patient survival. Thirdly, it is well known that, in the general population, microalbuminuria is related to a higher mortality from all causes, including cardiovascular causes 37,38 . This relationship is generally attributed to an association between albuminuria / proteinuria and alterations in endothelial function and / or inflammation. Recently, in a retrospective study it was observed that microalbuminuria is related to the survival of renal transplant patients 39 . In this study, what has been surprising is that albuminuria was related not only to an increase in cardiovascular risk but also to an increase in the risk of cancer mortality. Albuminuria is very common after transplantation, so it is important to confirm these relationships and to study factors that may explain the mechanisms underlying the relationship between proteinuria and renal transplant survivorship.

TREATMENT

Treatment of a patient with proteinuria should include three aspects: 1) specific treatment of the cause of proteinuria; 2) reduction of proteinuria using non-specific treatments, and 3) treatment of cardiovascular risk. Treatment of proteinuria, particularly of a low level, is often limited to control of blood pressure or the use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, which may reduce the concentration of protein in the urine. Although these maneuvers are probably useful, in our opinion it is a mistake not to try to investigate the possible cause of proteinuria. Establishing such a cause not only can give us prognostic information about the graft,

Specific Treatments

In this review we can not discuss in detail all the therapies we can use to treat the multiple causes of proteinuria in transplantation (Table 1). In general, the treatment of recurrent glomerulopathies follows the same guidelines used in the treatment of these diseases in the native kidney. However, when we treat these diseases in the transplanted patient we must consider several particular factors:

1. The use of antirejection drugs may modify the behavior of certain glomerulopathies in the graft. For example, if we consider the low prevalence of recurrence of diseases such as lupus erythematosus. In addition, antirejection drugs may modify the effects of other drugs. For example, anti-CD20 antibodies are known to cause B lymphocyte depletion over a much longer period in transplant patients than in other patients 40,41 . In our experience, cyclophosphamide may be used in the treatment of aggressive acute graft glomerulopathies, but its use should be avoided at the same time as azathioprine or mycophenolate, given the high risk of leukopenia.

2. Patients who received a transplant obviously had glomerulopathy in the native kidney. Therefore, it is possible that in transplant patients these diseases may be especially aggressive. This, of course, is not applicable to all patients and, for example, the recurrence of IgA nephropathy is generally mild. However, other studies have suggested that the aggressiveness of the disease in the native kidney is reproduced in the graft, for example in the case of GSF 42 . We also detected a low spontaneous remission of NM in the graft: among 34 patients diagnosed of recurrent NM by biopsies per protocol and with minimal clinical manifestations, 33 have presented a progressive increase of proteinuria and, in those cases with follow-up biopsies, A histological worsening of nephropathy. These considerations have implications for deciding when to treat the patient with recurrence.

3. In the graft, glomerulopathies can be diagnosed in the initial stages because in these patients proteinuria is measured periodically 43 . In our service, the use of biopsies by protocol allows us to diagnose these diseases frequently when there are no clinical manifestations. Perhaps for this reason certain treatments are more effective in grafting than in the native kidney. For example, plasmapheresis may be effective in the treatment of certain cases of GSF 44 and GNMP 10.45 . The early diagnosis of these diseases can theoretically improve their response to treatment, as we have seen, in the case of NM 40 .

In patients with proteinuria, it is useful to measure the level of anti-HLA antibodies for several reasons: 1) most patients with transplant glomerulopathy have or have had anti-HLA class II antibodies, so their presence is diagnostic; 2) the existence of anti-HLA II antibodies and proteinuria is an early index of capillary damage by antibodies and is associated with reduced graft survival; 3) the level of anti-HLA class II antibodies is related to graft survival and this relationship is independent of other factors such as biopsy markers (mainly the presence of C4d in capillaries) and biochemical markers (proteinuria and renal function) 46 ; 4) the appearance of new anti-HLA antibodies indicates that immunosuppression is not effective, either because the patient is not taking his medication regularly, or because the doses indicated are not sufficient; 5) in patients who develop anti-HLA antibodies after transplantation it is sometimes possible to suppress the level of antibodies with higher doses of immunosuppressants and our recommendation is to increase the dose of mycophenolate and / or tacrolimus for a limited period of approximately six months, Periodically measuring serum antibody levels.

In patients receiving m-TOR inhibitors it is essential to monitor proteinuria periodically and if this increases significantly we recommend stopping the drug. Sirolimus can dramatically increase proteinuria due to glomerulopathy, even when it is mild. In our experience, discontinuation of this medication results in an improvement in proteinuria over a period of a few months. In patients with a high level of proteinuria, sirolimus can produce acute renal failure 47 . Finally, it is important to mention that in patients with proteinuria a change from ICN to m-TOR inhibitors can be harmful 26 . 

As discussed earlier, we have detected that approximately 50% of patients with transplant proteinuria may be related to donor or recipient factors indicative of a significant discrepancy between the limited functional capacity of the graft to respond to the recipient's demands. Possibly, in these cases proteinuria is due to glomerular hypertension and glomerular hyperfiltration and, if this is the case, the inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) should be considered as a specific treatment for the cause of proteinuria 48 .

Non-specific treatment of proteinuria in renal transplantation

Based on the results of studies of proteinuria control in chronic kidney disease, it seems reasonable to recommend the following non-specific measures in patients undergoing transplantation: 1) blood pressure control (systolic blood pressure less than 130 mmHg); 2)  use of ACE inhibitors and / or angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AIIRAs) at the highest tolerated dose, even if there is no hypertension; 3) lipid profile control, preferably with statins; 4) maintain a proper BMI; 5) protein restriction in the diet, and 6) smoking cessation 49 .

First, we must insist that, in patients with transplanted kidney problems, these measures reduce the progression of kidney failure, but in general, do not prevent their appearance 50 . Therefore, we must consider these non-specific measures as a treatment to be added to the specific treatment. Second, although inhibition of RAS reduces transplant proteinuria, there is insufficient evidence to improve graft survival. Thirdly, it is important to emphasize that the use of ACE inhibitors or ARBs in patients undergoing transplantation can have important negative consequences; Therefore, special precautions should be taken, including the use of low doses and monitoring of creatinine,

A systematic review 51 of 21 randomized studies on the use of ACE inhibitors and / or AIIRAs and including 1,549 transplant patients concluded that these drugs produce a clinically significant reduction of proteinuria but also hematocrit and hematocrit. Glomerular filtration rate. In this study, no significant differences were observed in blood pressure control or graft survival. However, the studies included in this review have limitations due to the small sample size, the reduced follow-up time and the start of treatment at different times after transplantation. A prospective, randomized, Controlled and multicenter study evaluated the effect of an ARI II (candesartan) on graft survival and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in 502 renal transplant patients 52 . This study was earlier than expected because of a lower-than-expected rate of events but it was observed that patients treated with candesartan had a significant decrease in proteinuria and a better control of blood pressure compared to patients receiving placebo . Two observational and retrospective studies attempted to elucidate the effect of inhibition of RAS on graft survival, but with conflicting results. In the first of them 53 , A significant beneficial effect on the survival of both the graft and the patient was found to be independent of the presence of proteinuria. In contrast, the second of these studies 54 concluded that inhibition of RAS has no beneficial effects either on graft survival or on patient survival, even in subgroups of patients at high cardiovascular risk. In summary, with the data available today it would be premature to recommend treatment with ACEI and / or ARI II in order to improve the survival of the graft or the patient in the renal transplant, since this effect is still unknown. The second of these studies 54 concluded that the inhibition of RAS has no beneficial effects either on graft survival or on patient survival, even in subgroups of patients with high cardiovascular risk. In summary, with the data available today it would be premature to recommend treatment with ACE inhibitors and / or ARAII in order to improve the survival of the graft or the patient in the renal transplant, since this effect is still unknown. The second of these studies 54 concluded that the inhibition of RAS has no beneficial effects either on graft survival or on patient survival, even in subgroups of patients with high cardiovascular risk. In summary, with the data available today it would be premature to recommend treatment with ACEI and / or ARI II in order to improve the survival of the graft or the patient in the renal transplant, since this effect is still unknown.

Cardioprotection
The presence of proteinuria, even low - level, primarily identifies patients with reduced survival, but not only for increased cardiovascular risk 34,36 . The mechanism that causes this increased risk is not currently known and we do not have enough data (as we have seen in the previous section) to conclude whether the reduction of proteinuria or the use of RAS inhibitors improves the prognosis of these patients. However, it is reasonable to intensify cardioprotective measures in patients with proteinuria; These measures should include: blood pressure monitoring (less than 130 mmHg); Use of statins by maintaining the LDL cholesterol level below 100 mg / dl (less than 80 mg / dl in high-risk patients 55 ); Strict glycemic control in patients with diabetes (measure debatable on the basis of recent studies 56 ); Avoid tobacco use; Use of aspirin, and use of beta-blockers. Among these measures, we have only evidence, based on prospective, controlled and randomized studies, that the use of statins is effective in transplant patients 57 .

KEY CONCEPTS

1. Proteinuria after transplantation is common and may be due to multiple causes.

2. Proteinuria, even when low level (<500 mg / day), is a sensitive indicator of reduced graft survival.

3. The reduction in the survival of the graft with proteinuria is probably due to the same problem that causes proteinuria. Therefore, it is critical to investigate the cause of proteinuria after transplantation.

4. Proteinuria, even when low level (<500 mg / day), is also associated with a reduction in patient survival mainly due to an increase in cardiovascular risk.

5. The treatment of proteinuria should consider three aspects: the cause, the reduction with non-specific measures and the reduction of the cardiovascular risk associated with it.

Friday, April 21, 2017

Kidney transplant

Kidney transplant


It is a surgery to place a healthy kidney in a person with kidney failure .

Description
Kidney transplants are one of the most common transplant operations in the United States.

You need a kidney donated to replace the work previously done by your kidneys.

The donated kidney can come from:

A living family donor, related to the recipient, as a parent, sibling, or child
A donor not related to the recipient, such as a friend or spouse
A deceased donor, a recently deceased person who is known to have had no chronic kidney disease
The healthy kidney is transported in cold water with salt (saline solution) that preserves the organ for up to 48 hours. This gives health care providers time to perform blood and tissue compatibility tests of the donor and recipient prior to the operation.

PROCEDURE FOR A LIVING KIDNEY DONOR:

If you are going to donate a kidney, you will be given general anesthesia prior to surgery, which means you will be asleep and will not feel pain. Currently, surgeons may use smaller surgical incisions with laparoscopic techniques to remove the kidney.

PROCEDURE FOR THE PERSON RECEIVING THE KIDNEY (RECEIVER):

People receiving a kidney transplant are given general anesthesia prior to surgery.

The surgeon makes an incision in the lower abdominal area.
The surgeon places the new kidney into the lower abdomen. The artery and vein of the new kidney are connected to the artery and vein in the pelvis. Blood circulates through the new kidney, which produces urine exactly as your own kidneys did when they were healthy. Then the conduit that carries the urine (ureter) is connected to the bladder.
Your kidneys are left in place, unless they are causing a health problem. Then the wound closes.
Kidney transplant surgery takes about 3 hours. Diabetic people can also have a pancreas transplant at the same time. This can add another 3 hours to the surgery.

Why the procedure is performed
Your doctor may recommend a kidney transplant if you have end-stage kidney disease. The most common cause of end-stage renal disease in the United States. Is diabetes. However, there are many other causes.

A kidney transplant may NOT be performed if you have:

Certain infections, such as TB or bone infections
Problems taking your medication several times each day for the rest of your life
Liver disease, heart disease or lung disease
Other life-threatening diseases
Recent history of cancer
Infections such as hepatitis
Current behaviors such as smoking, alcohol or drug abuse or other risky lifestyle habits
Risks
Specific risks related to this procedure include:

Blood clots (deep vein thrombosis)
Heart attack or stroke
Wound Infections
Side Effects of Medications Used to Prevent Transplant Rejection
Loss of kidney transplanted
Before Procedure
Once the doctor returns you to a transplant center, the transplant team will evaluate and examine you. They need to verify that you meet the requirements for a kidney transplant. You will have several visits over the course of several weeks or even months and you will also need blood taken and x-rays taken.

Exams that are done before the procedure include:

Histotyping and blood grouping to help verify that your body will not reject the donated kidney
Blood or skin tests to check for infections
Heart tests such as electrocardiography, echocardiography, or cardiac catheterization
Exams to look for early cancer
It will also be necessary to consider one or more transplant centers to determine which is best for you.

Ask the center staff how many transplants they carry out each year and what the survival rates are. Compare these numbers with those of other transplant centers.
Ask about support groups they have available and the type of travel and lodging arrangements they offer.
If the transplant team believes that you are eligible for a kidney transplant, they will put you on a national waiting list.

Your place on a waiting list depends on many factors. Key factors include the type of kidney problems you have, the severity of your heart disease, and the likelihood that the transplant will be successful.

For adults, the time you usually stay on a waiting list is not a factor that determines how quickly you get a kidney. Most people waiting for a kidney transplant are on dialysis. While waiting for a kidney:

Follow any diet your transplant team recommends.
Do not drink alcohol.
Do not smoke.
Keep your weight in the recommended range. Follow any recommended exercise program.
Take all medicines as prescribed. Report changes in your medicines and any new or worsening medical problems to the transplant team.
Attend medical check-ups with your regular doctor and transplant team. Make sure the transplant team has the correct phone numbers, so they can immediately tell you if a kidney is available. Make sure they can contact you quickly and easily.
List everything in advance to go to the hospital.
After the Procedure
If you received a kidney donated, you will need to stay in the hospital for about 3 to 7 days. After this, you will need careful monitoring by a doctor and regular blood tests for 1 to 2 months.

The recovery period is approximately 6 months. Often the transplant team will ask you to stay close to the hospital for the first 3 months. You will need to have regular medical checkups with blood tests and x-rays for many years.

Expectations (prognosis)
Almost everyone feels that they have a better quality of life after transplantation. Those who receive a kidney from a living related donor have a better prognosis than those who receive it from a deceased donor. If you donate a kidney, you can often live safely and uncomplicated with the remaining kidney.

People who receive a transplanted kidney may reject the new organ. This means that your immune system sees the new kidney as a foreign substance and tries to destroy it.

In order to avoid rejection, almost all kidney transplant recipients have to take medications that inhibit the immune response for the rest of their lives, which is called immunosuppressive therapy. Although the treatment helps prevent organ rejection, it also puts patients at greater risk for infection and cancer. If you take this medicine, you need to have cancer screenings. Medications can also cause high blood pressure and high cholesterol and increase the risk of diabetes.

A successful kidney transplant requires careful control with the doctor and you have to always take the medication according to the instructions.

Wednesday, April 19, 2017

Acute renal failure (ARF) (Acute renal failure)

Acute renal failure (ARF)

(Acute renal failure)


cute renal failure is the rapid decrease in renal function in days or weeks that causes accumulation of nitrogenous products in the blood (azotemia). It is often caused by severe trauma, illness or surgery, but is sometimes due to an intrinsic kidney disease of rapid progression. Symptoms include anorexia, nausea, and vomiting. If the condition is not treated, convulsions and coma may occur. Fluid alterations, electrolytes and acid-base balance develop rapidly. The diagnosis is based on laboratory tests of renal function, including serum creatinine. Urinary indices, urinary sediment analysis, and often imaging and other studies are needed to determine the cause. Treatment is directed to the cause,

In all cases of acute renal failure (ARF), creatinine and urea accumulate in the body over several days, and fluid and electrolytes are altered. The most serious of these alterations are hyperkalemia and fluid overload (possibly causing pulmonary edema). Retention of phosphates causes hyperphosphatemia. It is assumed that hypocalcemia is due to the fact that the diseased kidney no longer produces calcitriol , since hyperphosphatemia causes precipitation in the tissues of calcium phosphate. Acidosis occurs because the protons can not be excreted. With high uremia, coagulation may be affected, and pericarditis may occur. Urine excretion varies according to the type and cause of ARF.

Etiology
The causes of ARF (see Main causes of acute renal failure ) can be classified in

Prerenal

Renal

Posrenals

Azotemia azotemia is due to inadequate perfusion of the kidneys. The main causes are the depletion of extracellular fluid volume and cardiovascular diseases. Prerenal plaques cause 50-80% of FRA, but do not cause permanent renal damage (and thus are potentially reversible) unless hypoperfusion is so severe that it causes tubular ischemia. The hypoperfusion of a kidney by other functioning leads to an increased reabsorption of Na and water, which produces oliguria with urine of high osmolality and low Na content.

Kidney causes of ARF involve intrinsic disease or kidney damage. Kidney causes are responsible for 10 to 40% of cases. In general, the most common causes are prolonged renal ischemia and nephrotoxins (including radiopaque iodine contrast agents for IV use see Contrast Nephropathy ). These disorders can affect the glomeruli, tubules or interstitium. Glomerular diseases reduce the rate of glomerular filtration and increase the permeability of glomerular capillaries to proteins; May be inflammatory (glomerulonephritis) or the result of vascular damage by ischemia or vasculitis. Tubules can also be damaged by ischemia and clogged by cell debris, Deposition of proteins or crystals and cellular or interstitial edema. Tubular damage affects the reabsorption of Na, so this ion increases its concentration in the urine, a fact that is useful for diagnosis. Interstitial inflammation (nephritis) usually involves an immune or allergic phenomenon. These mechanisms of tubular damage are complex and interdependent, which makes the old popular term of acute tubular necrosis an inadequate description.

Posthumous azotemia (obstructive nephropathy - See also Obstructive uropathy ) is due to several types of obstruction in the collection and evacuation areas of the urinary tract, and is responsible for 5 to 10% of cases. Obstruction may also occur within the tubules when crystalline or proteinaceous material precipitates. This form of renal failure is often grouped with postnatal insufficiency because its mechanism is obstructive. The obstructed flow of the ultrafiltrate into the tubules or in more distal areas increases the pressure in the urinary space of the glomeruli, reducing the rate of glomerular filtration. The obstruction also affects the renal blood flow, Initially increasing the flow and pressure in the glomerular capillaries by reducing the resistance of the afferent artery. However, within 3 to 4 hours, renal blood flow declines, and by 24 hours has decreased to < 50% of normal due to increased resistance of renal vascularization. Renewascular resistance may take up to 1 week to return to normal after removal of a 24-hour blockage. To produce significant azotemia, obstruction at the level of the ureter requires that both ureters be affected, unless the patient has only one functioning kidney. Obstruction of the bladder outlet tract is probably the most common cause of cessation of sudden, and often total, urine output in males. However, within 3 to 4 hours, renal blood flow declines, and by 24 hours has decreased to < 50% of normal due to increased resistance of renal vascularization. Renewascular resistance may take up to 1 week to return to normal after removal of a 24-hour blockage. To produce significant azotemia, obstruction at the level of the ureter requires that both ureters be affected, unless the patient has only one functioning kidney. Obstruction of the bladder outlet tract is probably the most common cause of cessation of sudden, and often total, urine output in males. However, within 3 to 4 hours, renal blood flow declines, and by 24 hours has decreased to < 50% of normal due to increased resistance of renal vascularization. Renewascular resistance may take up to 1 week to return to normal after removal of a 24-hour blockage. To produce significant azotemia, obstruction at the level of the ureter requires that both ureters be affected, unless the patient has only one functioning kidney. Obstruction of the bladder outlet tract is probably the most common cause of cessation of sudden, and often total, urine output in males. 50% of normal due to increased resistance of renal vascularization. Renewascular resistance may take up to 1 week to return to normal after removal of a 24-hour blockage. To produce significant azotemia, obstruction at the level of the ureter requires that both ureters be affected, unless the patient has only one functioning kidney. Obstruction of the bladder outlet tract is probably the most common cause of cessation of sudden, and often total, urine output in males. 50% of normal due to increased resistance of renal vascularization. Renewascular resistance may take up to 1 week to return to normal after removal of a 24-hour blockage. To produce significant azotemia, obstruction at the level of the ureter requires that both ureters be affected, unless the patient has only one functioning kidney. Obstruction of the bladder outlet tract is probably the most common cause of cessation of sudden, and often total, urine output in men. Obstruction at the level of the ureter requires that both ureters be affected, unless the patient has only one functioning kidney. Obstruction of the bladder outlet tract is probably the most common cause of cessation of sudden, and often total, urine output in males. Obstruction at the level of the ureter requires that both ureters be affected, unless the patient has only one functioning kidney. Obstruction of the bladder outlet tract is probably the most common cause of cessation of sudden, and often total, urine output in males.

Production of urine
Typically, the prerenal causes are manifested with oliguria, not anuria. Anuria usually occurs in obstructive uropathy or, less frequently, in bilateral renal artery occlusion, acute cortical necrosis, or rapidly progressing glomerulonephritis.

In most renal causes, a relatively preserved urine production of 1 to 2.4 L / day is usually present at the beginning. In acute tubular injury, urine production may have 3 phases.

Clinical Calculator: Kidney Failure Rate
The prodromal phase, usually with normal urine output, varies in duration depending on the cause (eg, amount of toxin ingested, duration and severity of hypotension).

The oliguric phase , with a typical production of between 50 and 400 mL / day, lasts on average about 10 to 14 days but can oscillate between 1 day and 8 weeks. However, many patients never present oliguria. Non-oliguric patients have lower morbidity and mortality and less need for dialysis.

In the posoliguric phase , urine excretion gradually returns to its normal value, but serum creatinine and urea concentrations may not decrease for several days. Tubal dysfunction may persist and manifests as loss of Na, polyuria (possibly massive) that does not respond to vasopressin , or hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis.


Signs and symptoms
At first, the only findings may be weight gain and peripheral edema. Often, the predominant symptoms are those of the underlying disease or those caused by surgical complications that precipitated renal deterioration. Later, as nitrogen products accumulate, uremia symptoms may appear, including anorexia, nausea, vomiting, weakness, myoclonus, convulsions, confusion, and coma. Asterixis and hyperreflexia may appear on the test. If there is uremic pericarditis, chest pain (which typically worsens on inspiration or in decubitus), pericardial rubbing, and signs of pericardial tamponade may occur. The accumulation of fluid in the lungs can cause dyspnoea and crackles in auscultation.

Other findings depend on the cause. Urine may be dark-colored (cola-colored) in glomerulonephritis or myoglobinuria. The bladder may be palpable if there is obstruction of the outflow tract. The costovertebral angle may be sensitive to touch if the kidney enlarges acutely.

Diagnosis
Serum Creatinine

Urinary sediment

Urinary Diagnostic Indices

Residual volume posmiction of the bladder, if an afterthought is suspected

An ARF is suspected when urine production declines, or urea nitrogen and creatinine in the blood increase. The assessment should determine the presence and type of ARF, and look for its cause. Blood tests usually include complete blood count, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and electrolytes (including Ca and phosphate). Urine tests include Na and creatinine concentration and microscopic analysis of the sediment. Early detection and treatment increase the likelihood of reversing renal failure and, in some cases, preventing it.

A progressive daily increase in serum creatinine is a diagnosis of ARF. Serum creatinine may increase to 2 mg / dL / day (180 μ mol / L / day), depending on the amount of creatinine produced, which varies with the lean body mass and total body water. An increase > 2 mg / dL / day suggests that there is excessive production due to rhabdomyolysis.

Urea nitrogen can increase by 10 to 20 mg / dL / day (3.6 to 7.1 mmol urea / L / day), but its determination in the blood can be misleading, as it frequently rises in response to Increased protein catabolism due to surgery, trauma, corticosteroids, burns, transfusion reactions, parenteral nutrition, or digestive or internal hemorrhage.

When creatinine is elevated, the 24-hour urine collection for creatinine clearance and the various formulas used to determine this value from serum creatinine are imprecise and are not used to estimate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), since That increased serum creatinine is a late consequence of decreased GFR.

Other laboratory findings are progressive acidosis, hyperkalemia, hyponatremia, and anemia. Acidosis in general is moderate, with an HCO 3 plasma content of 15 to 20 mmol / L. The potassium concentration in the serum rises slowly, but when the catabolism is very fast, it can increase by 1 or 2 mmol / day. Hyponatremia is usually moderate (serum Na of 125 to 135 mmol / L) and correlates with excess water. Normocytic and normocytic anemia is typical, with hematocrit of 25 to 30%.

Hypocalcemia is common, and may be marked in patients with myoglobinuric ARF, apparently because of the combined effects of calcium deposition on the necrotic muscle, decreased calcitriol production , bone resistance to PTH and Hyperphosphataemia. During recovery of FRA, hypercalcemia may occur as calcitriol production increases , bone begins to respond to PTH, and calcium deposits are mobilized from damaged tissues.

Determination of cause
Prerenal or postenal causes that can be easily reversed should be excluded first. Extracellular fluid volume and obstruction should be considered in all patients. The history of drug use should be accurately recorded and all potentially toxic drugs should be discontinued. Urinary diagnostic indices (see Urinary Diagnostic Indices for prerenal azotemia and acute tubular injury ) are useful for distinguishing prerenal azotemia from acute tubular injury, which are the most common causes of ARF in hospitalized patients.

The prerenal causes are often clinically evident. In this case, correction of the underlying hemodynamic abnormality should be attempted. For example, in hypovolemia, infusion of volume may be attempted; Diuretics and afterload reducing agents can be given in heart failure; And in hepatic impairment, octreotide may be given . The disappearance of the FRA confirms a prerenal cause.


The postrenal causes should be investigated in most cases FRA. Immediately after urination, an ultrasound of the bladder is performed at the foot of the bed (or, alternatively, a urinary catheter is placed) to determine the amount of residual urine in the bladder. A residual post-volume volume of > 200 mL suggests that there is an obstruction of the bladder outlet tract, although it may also be caused by weakness of the detrusor muscle or by a neurogenic bladder. The probe should be kept on the first day to monitor urine production hourly, but may be withdrawn once oliguria has been confirmed (if there is no obstruction of the bladder outlet) to reduce the risk of infection. A renal ultrasound is then performed to diagnose more proximal obstructions. However, sensitivity to obstruction is only 80-85% when ultrasound is used, because the collecting system is not always dilated, especially when the condition is acute, there is an intrarenal pelvis, the ureter is trapped In retroperitoneal fibrosis or neoplasia) or if the patient has concomitant hypovolemia. If the suspicion of obstruction is strong, noncontrast CT can establish its location and direct therapy. The ureter is trapped (as in retroperitoneal fibrosis or neoplasia) or if the patient has concomitant hypovolemia. If the suspicion of obstruction is strong, noncontrast CT can establish its location and direct therapy. The ureter is trapped (as in retroperitoneal fibrosis or neoplasia) or if the patient has concomitant hypovolemia. If the suspicion of obstruction is strong, noncontrast CT can establish its location and direct therapy.

The urinary sediment can provide clues about the etiology. In prerenal azotemia and sometimes in obstructive uropathy, a normal sediment appears. In renal tubular injury, the characteristic sediment has tubular cells, tubular cell cylinders and many granular cylinders (often with brown pigments). Urinary eosinophils suggest an allergic tubulointerstitial nephritis; The erythrocyte cylinders, glomerulonephritis or vasculitis.

The renal causes are sometimes suggested by clinical findings. Patients with glomerulonephritis (see Glomerulopathies ) often have edema, marked proteinuria (nephrotic syndrome) or signs of arteritis in the skin and retina, sometimes without a history of intrinsic kidney disease. Hemoptysis suggests granulomatosis with polyangeitis (formerly Wegener's granulomatosis) or Goodpasture's syndrome. Certain eruptions (such as erythema nodosum, cutaneous vasculitis, discoid lupus) suggest polyarteritis, cryoglobulinemia, SLE or Schönlein-Henoch purpura. Tubulointerstitial nephritis and drug allergies are suspected when there is a history of drug administration and a maculopapular or purpuric rash.

To further differentiate renal causes, titers of antistreptolysin-O and complement, antinuclear antibodies and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies should be determined. If a diagnosis is not yet made, a renal biopsy may be performed (see Causes of acute renal failure according to laboratory results ).

Studies by the image
In addition to renal ultrasound, other imaging studies are sometimes useful. To evaluate a ureteral obstruction, contrast-enhanced CT is preferred over antegrade and retrograde urography. In addition to its ability to delineate soft tissue structures and calcium stones, CT can also detect non-radiopaque stones.

If possible, contrast agents should be avoided. However, arteriography or renal venography may sometimes be indicated if the clinical findings suggest a vascular cause. Magnetic resonance angiography was widely used for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis as well as arterial and venous thrombosis because it used gadolinium, which was believed to be much safer than iodinated contrast agents of angiography and Of CT with contrast. However, recent evidence indicates that gadolinium may participate in the pathogenesis of systemic nephrogenic fibrosis, a serious complication occurring only in patients with ARF. Therefore, if possible, gadolinium should be avoided in such patients.

It is useful to know the size of the kidney through imaging because an organ of normal or increased size favors the reversibility of the picture, whereas a small kidney suggests chronic renal failure.

Forecast
Although many causes are reversible if they are diagnosed and treated early, the overall survival rate remains at 50% because many patients with ARF have major underlying disorders (sepsis, respiratory failure). In general, death is usually a result of these disorders rather than the FRA itself. Most patients who survive have an adequate kidney function. Approximately 10% require dialysis or transplantation; Half of them immediately and the rest as kidney function deteriorates.

Treatment
Immediate treatment of pulmonary edema and hyperkalemia

Dialysis as needed to control hyperkalemia, pulmonary edema, metabolic acidosis, and uremic symptoms

Adjustment of medication regimen

In general, restriction of water intake, Na, phosphate and K, but with adequate protein supply

Possibly, phosphate binding agents and Na polystyrene sulfonate

Emergency treatment
Complications that endanger the patient's life should be treated, preferably in an intensive care unit. Pulmonary edema (see Edema of the lung ) is treated with O 2 , IV vasodilators (such as nitroglycerin) and diuretics (which are often not effective in ARF). Hyperkalemia (see Hyperkalemia ) is treated as needed with IV infusion of 10 mL of 10% Ca gluconate, 50 g of dextrose and 5 to 10 units of insulin. These drugs do not reduce total body K, so a subsequent (slower acting) treatment is initiated with 30 g Na polystyrene sulfonate either orally or rectally. Since the correction of metabolic acidosis with an anionic gap with NaHCO 3 is controversial, It is more acceptable to correct the non-anionic hiatus portion of severe metabolic acidosis (pH < 7.20), which can be treated with diluted NaHCO 3 as a slow infusion ( ≤ 150 mEq of NaHCO 3 in 1 L of 5% , At a rate of 50 to 100 mL / hour). The portion of the metabolic acidosis without an anion gap is determined by calculating the above-normal anion gap and then subtracting this value from the decrease of NaHCO 3 to the value of 24 mmol / L. NaHCO 3 is administered to increase the serum HCO 3 by this difference. Since the variation in body damping systems and rate of acid production are difficult to predict, It is generally not recommended to calculate the amount of NaHCO 3 needed to achieve a complete correction. Instead, NaHCO 3 is administered in a continuous infusion, and the anion gap is monitored serially.

The hemodialysis (see Hemodialysis ) or hemofiltration (see hemofiltration and hemodialysis continuous ) start when

Severe anomalies of the electrolytes can not be controlled in any other way (eg K > 6 mmol / L)

Pulmonary edema persists despite pharmacological treatment

Metabolic acidosis does not improve with treatment

Uremic symptoms (eg, vomiting attributable to uremia, asterixis, encephalopathy, pericarditis, seizures)

Blood urea nitrogen and creatinine concentrations are probably not the best guidelines for initiating dialysis in patients with ARF. In asymptomatic patients who are not severely ill, especially in those who are considered likely to regain renal function, dialysis may be delayed until symptoms appear, thus avoiding the placement of a central venous route with associated complications.

General measures
All nephrotoxic drugs should be discontinued and doses adjusted for all renal excretion drugs (eg, digoxin, some antibiotics); Determination of serum concentrations may be useful.

Daily water intake is restricted to a volume equal to the previous day's urine output plus measured extrarenal losses (eg, vomiting), plus 500 to 1,000 mL per day to compensate for non-measurable losses. It can be further decreased if there is hyponatremia, or increased if there is hypernatremia. Although weight gain indicates excess fluid, water intake is not decreased if serum Na remains normal; Instead, the consumption of Na is restricted.

Intake of Na and K is minimized, except in patients with previous deficiencies or gastrointestinal losses. Adequate diet should be provided, with a daily protein intake of approximately 0.8 g / kg. If oral or enteral nutrition is impossible, the parenteral route is used; However, in IVF IV nutrition increases the risk of fluid overload, hyperosmolarity, and infections. Calcium (carbonate, acetate) salts or synthetic phosphate-free substances before meals help maintain serum phosphate levels < 5 mg / dL ( < 1.78 mmol / L). If K is needed to maintain serum K < 6 mmol / L in the absence of dialysis (eg, if other therapies, such as diuretics, They fail to decrease K), a cation exchange resin, Na polystyrene sulfonate, is administered in doses of 15 to 60 g orally or rectally, 1 to 4 times per day, as a suspension in water or in a Syrup (eg, 70% sorbitol). A permanent bladder catheter is rarely needed and should be used only if necessary, because of the increased risk of urinary infection and urosepsis.

In many patients, relief of an obstruction produces intense and even dramatic diuresis as a physiological response to the expansion of the ECC during obstruction that does not compromise volume. However, polyuria accompanied by excretion of large amounts of Na, K, Mg and other solutes may cause hypokalemia, hyponatremia, hypernatremia (if no free water is supplied), hypomagnesemia or marked contraction of ECC volume with peripheral vascular collapse. In this posoliguric phase, it is essential to closely monitor fluid and electrolyte balance. Excessive salt and water administration after release of an obstruction may prolong diuresis. When a posoliguric diuresis occurs, the volume of the urine is replaced with saline at 0,

Prevention
FRA can be prevented by maintaining a normal fluid balance, blood volume and blood pressure in patients with major trauma, burn or bleeding, and those who are undergoing major surgeries. Infusion of isotonic saline and blood may be helpful. The use of contrast agents should be minimal, especially in the highest risk groups (eg, the elderly and those with pre-existing renal impairment, volume depletion, diabetes, or heart failure). If contrast agents are required, the risk can be lowered by minimizing the volume of IV contrast agent, non-ionic, low osmolality or iso-molecular agents, avoidance of NSAIDs, and normal saline at 1 mL / kg / H IV for 12 hours prior to the study. The infusion before and after administration of isotonic NaHCO 3 contrast has also been successfully used in place of physiological solution. N- acetylcysteine has been used in doses of 600 mg orally twice daily for the day before and the day of administration of contrast IV to prevent nephropathy, but reports of its efficacy are controversial.

Before initiating cytolytic therapy in patients with certain neoplastic diseases (lymphoma, leukemia), treatment with either rasburicase or allopurinol should be considered together with an increase in urinary flow by administration of oral fluids or IV to reduce the formation of crystals Of urates. It has been recommended to make urine more alkaline (with oral NaHCO 3 or IV, or acetazolamide), but this treatment is controversial because it can also induce precipitation of urinary calcium phosphate and crystalluria, which can make the ARF worse.

The renal vasculature is very sensitive to endothelin, a potent vasoconstrictor that reduces renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate. Endothelin is implicated in progressive renal damage, and its receptor antagonists have been used successfully to slow or even slow the progression of experimental renal disease. Antiendothelin antibodies and endothelin receptor antagonists are being studied as potential kidney protectors in ischemic ARF.

Key concepts
The causes of ARF may be prerenal (eg, renal hypoperfusion), renal (eg, direct effects on the kidney) or postrenal (eg, obstruction of the urinary tract distal to the kidneys).

In FRA, consider the loss of ECL volume and nephrotoxins, obtain urinary diagnostic indices, and measure the residual volume of the bladder to identify an obstruction.

Avoid the use of intravenous contrasts in diagnostic imaging studies.

Initiate hemodialysis or hemofiltration as needed based on pulmonary edema, hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, or uremic symptoms that do not respond to other treatments.

Minimize the risk of acute renal failure in patients at risk by maintaining normal fluid balance, avoiding nephrotoxins (including contrast agents) when possible, and taking precautions such as administration of liquids or medications when it is necessary to use a contrast agent Or cytolytic therapy.

Resources in this articleStudies by the image
In addition to renal ultrasound, other imaging studies are sometimes useful. To evaluate a ureteral obstruction, contrast-enhanced CT is preferred over antegrade and retrograde urography. In addition to its ability to delineate soft tissue structures and calcium stones, CT can also detect non-radiopaque stones.

If possible, contrast agents should be avoided. However, arteriography or renal venography may sometimes be indicated if the clinical findings suggest a vascular cause. Magnetic resonance angiography was widely used for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis as well as arterial and venous thrombosis because it used gadolinium, which was believed to be much safer than iodinated contrast agents of angiography and Of CT with contrast. However, recent evidence indicates that gadolinium may participate in the pathogenesis of systemic nephrogenic fibrosis, a serious complication occurring only in patients with ARF. Therefore, if possible, gadolinium should be avoided in such patients.

It is useful to know the size of the kidney through imaging because an organ of normal or increased size favors the reversibility of the picture, whereas a small kidney suggests chronic renal failure.

Forecast
Although many causes are reversible if they are diagnosed and treated early, the overall survival rate remains at 50% because many patients with ARF have major underlying disorders (sepsis, respiratory failure). In general, death is usually a result of these disorders rather than the FRA itself. Most patients who survive have an adequate kidney function. Approximately 10% require dialysis or transplantation; Half of them immediately and the rest as kidney function deteriorates.

Treatment
Immediate treatment of pulmonary edema and hyperkalemia

Dialysis as needed to control hyperkalemia, pulmonary edema, metabolic acidosis, and uremic symptoms

Adjustment of medication regimen

In general, restriction of water intake, Na, phosphate and K, but with adequate protein supply

Possibly, phosphate binding agents and Na polystyrene sulfonate

Emergency treatment
Complications that endanger the patient's life should be treated, preferably in an intensive care unit. Pulmonary edema (see Edema of the lung ) is treated with O 2 , IV vasodilators (such as nitroglycerin) and diuretics (which are often not effective in ARF). Hyperkalemia (see Hyperkalemia ) is treated as needed with IV infusion of 10 mL of 10% Ca gluconate, 50 g of dextrose and 5 to 10 units of insulin. These drugs do not reduce total body K, so a subsequent (slower acting) treatment is initiated with 30 g Na polystyrene sulfonate either orally or rectally. Since the correction of metabolic acidosis with an anionic gap with NaHCO 3 is controversial, It is more acceptable to correct the non-anionic hiatus portion of severe metabolic acidosis (pH < 7.20), which can be treated with diluted NaHCO 3 as a slow infusion ( ≤ 150 mEq of NaHCO 3 in 1 L of 5% , At a rate of 50 to 100 mL / hour). The portion of the metabolic acidosis without an anion gap is determined by calculating the above-normal anion gap and then subtracting this value from the decrease of NaHCO 3 to the value of 24 mmol / L. NaHCO 3 is administered to increase the serum HCO 3 by this difference. Since the variation in body damping systems and rate of acid production are difficult to predict, It is generally not recommended to calculate the amount of NaHCO 3 needed to achieve a complete correction. Instead, NaHCO 3 is administered in a continuous infusion, and the anion gap is monitored serially.

The hemodialysis (see Hemodialysis ) or hemofiltration (see hemofiltration and hemodialysis continuous ) start when

Severe anomalies of the electrolytes can not be controlled in any other way (eg K > 6 mmol / L)

Pulmonary edema persists despite pharmacological treatment

Metabolic acidosis does not improve with treatment

Uremic symptoms (eg, vomiting attributable to uremia, asterixis, encephalopathy, pericarditis, seizures)

Blood urea nitrogen and creatinine concentrations are probably not the best guidelines for initiating dialysis in patients with ARF. In asymptomatic patients who are not severely ill, especially in those who are considered likely to regain renal function, dialysis may be delayed until symptoms appear, thus avoiding the placement of a central venous route with associated complications.

General measures
All nephrotoxic drugs should be discontinued and doses adjusted for all renal excretion drugs (eg, digoxin, some antibiotics); Determination of serum concentrations may be useful.

Daily water intake is restricted to a volume equal to the previous day's urine output plus measured extrarenal losses (eg, vomiting), plus 500 to 1,000 mL per day to compensate for non-measurable losses. It can be further decreased if there is hyponatremia, or increased if there is hypernatremia. Although weight gain indicates excess fluid, water intake is not decreased if serum Na remains normal; Instead, the consumption of Na is restricted.

Intake of Na and K is minimized, except in patients with previous deficiencies or gastrointestinal losses. Adequate diet should be provided, with a daily protein intake of approximately 0.8 g / kg. If oral or enteral nutrition is impossible, the parenteral route is used; However, in IVF IV nutrition increases the risk of fluid overload, hyperosmolarity, and infections. Calcium (carbonate, acetate) salts or synthetic phosphate-free substances before meals help maintain serum phosphate levels < 5 mg / dL ( < 1.78 mmol / L). If K is needed to maintain serum K < 6 mmol / L in the absence of dialysis (eg, if other therapies, such as diuretics, They fail to decrease K), a cation exchange resin, Na polystyrene sulfonate, is administered in doses of 15 to 60 g orally or rectally, 1 to 4 times per day, as a suspension in water or in a Syrup (eg, 70% sorbitol). A permanent bladder catheter is rarely needed and should be used only if necessary, because of the increased risk of urinary infection and urosepsis.

In many patients, relief of an obstruction produces intense and even dramatic diuresis as a physiological response to the expansion of the ECC during obstruction that does not compromise volume. However, polyuria accompanied by excretion of large amounts of Na, K, Mg and other solutes may cause hypokalemia, hyponatremia, hypernatremia (if no free water is supplied), hypomagnesemia or marked contraction of ECC volume with peripheral vascular collapse. In this posoliguric phase, it is essential to closely monitor fluid and electrolyte balance. Excessive salt and water administration after release of an obstruction may prolong diuresis. When a posoliguric diuresis occurs, the volume of the urine is replaced with saline at 0,

Prevention
FRA can be prevented by maintaining a normal fluid balance, blood volume and blood pressure in patients with major trauma, burn or bleeding, and those who are undergoing major surgeries. Infusion of isotonic saline and blood may be helpful. The use of contrast agents should be minimal, especially in the highest risk groups (eg, the elderly and those with pre-existing renal impairment, volume depletion, diabetes, or heart failure). If contrast agents are required, the risk can be lowered by minimizing the volume of IV contrast agent, non-ionic, low osmolality or iso-molecular agents, avoidance of NSAIDs, and normal saline at 1 mL / kg / H IV for 12 hours prior to the study. The infusion before and after administration of isotonic NaHCO 3 contrast has also been successfully used in place of physiological solution. N- acetylcysteine has been used in doses of 600 mg orally twice daily for the day before and the day of administration of contrast IV to prevent nephropathy, but reports of its efficacy are controversial.

Before initiating cytolytic therapy in patients with certain neoplastic diseases (lymphoma, leukemia), treatment with either rasburicase or allopurinol should be considered together with an increase in urinary flow by administration of oral fluids or IV to reduce the formation of crystals Of urates. It has been recommended to make urine more alkaline (with oral NaHCO 3 or IV, or acetazolamide), but this treatment is controversial because it can also induce precipitation of urinary calcium phosphate and crystalluria, which can make the ARF worse.

The renal vasculature is very sensitive to endothelin, a potent vasoconstrictor that reduces renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate. Endothelin is implicated in progressive renal damage, and its receptor antagonists have been used successfully to slow or even slow the progression of experimental renal disease. Antiendothelin antibodies and endothelin receptor antagonists are being studied as potential kidney protectors in ischemic ARF.

Key concepts
The causes of ARF may be prerenal (eg, renal hypoperfusion), renal (eg, direct effects on the kidney) or postrenal (eg, obstruction of the urinary tract distal to the kidneys).

In FRA, consider the loss of ECL volume and nephrotoxins, obtain urinary diagnostic indices, and measure the residual volume of the bladder to identify an obstruction.

Avoid the use of intravenous contrasts in diagnostic imaging studies.

Initiate hemodialysis or hemofiltration as needed based on pulmonary edema, hyperkalemia, metabolic acidosis, or uremic symptoms that do not respond to other treatments.

Minimize the risk of acute renal failure in patients at risk by maintaining normal fluid balance, avoiding nephrotoxins (including contrast agents) when possible, and taking precautions such as administration of liquids or medications when it is necessary to use a contrast agent Or cytolytic therapy.